A modern testing platform is a critical, but often overlooked, element of successful digital transformation. Could QA be the missing puzzle piece in your quest to deliver higher quality software faster?
The pace of software development is accelerating, and technology teams face increasing pressure to adopt agile development and continuous delivery models so that their businesses can more quickly respond to customer demand.
But your first-mover advantage will suffer if you are first to market with mediocre software.
If you fail to deliver high-quality digital experiences at the pace today’s users demand, you risk alienating customers. In the case of defect-ridden software, poor user experience, or a catastrophic bug, you risk losing significant market share and damaging your reputation.
In the rush to beat the competition to market, organizations are transforming software development and delivery processes. But too often, business leaders fail to prioritize QA transformation, and QA teams are stuck using ineffective legacy solutions that were built for outdated waterfall environments. The reality is that as long as your testers are using legacy QA tools, your transformation will remain incomplete. My friends at cPrime do a great job of explaining why quality must be prioritized equally in the quest for faster time to market.
Legacy QA tools like Micro Focus Quality Center can not accommodate modern development workflows. They do not integrate with open-source automation tools, giving testers limited options for accelerating test cycles and making it impossible to integrate QA into application lifecycle management or continuous delivery pipelines. This means QA teams lack visibility and are not able to test new code as it is written. Development is further delayed when developers cannot quickly access test results and mitigate issues QA has found. As a result, releases are delayed, and quality inevitably suffers.
When testing occurs end of a development sprint, bugs are often embedded in the code, where they are significantly costlier and more time-consuming to correct. As a result, the myth of the QA bottleneck persists. Or worse, the QA process is rushed, and organizations end up with defect-ridden releases that fail to provide the high-quality experiences their customers demand.
If you can integrate quality into agile and DevOps processes, instead of treating it as an afterthought, testing can occur almost simultaneously with development. When a tester finds a bug, he or she can alert a developer to address it right then, instead of after lines of dependent code have been written on top.
With the right approach, QA can help speed development by helping developers identify potential defects early. That means that QA is no longer pressured to complete testing quickly as the last step in a sprint. With a truly agile testing approach, QA can become a strategic enabler of business success, rather than a bottleneck.
Now is the time to ask yourself: Is your QA team truly agile?